This may seem like a significant step down from the massive gains seen previously, but factor this out over a year’s worth of CI runs and one starts to see how this could be beneficial, especially if you’re paying for CI time. In general, even for this relatively small environment, Mamba was approximately half a minute quicker to set everything up. Mamba is most akin to Miniconda, in that it comes with Python, but doesn’t ship with a whole load of extra software. This is where Mamba comes in, the fast drop-in replacement for conda, which reimplements the slow bits in in C++. Whilst Miniconda is small as compared with full-fat anaconda, the latest Miniconda3 Linux 64-bit Python 3.9 download size is 58.6 MiB, could this be better?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |